Louis Jonathan Cutwright v. Sean Crawford; Sheryl Dahm; Tracy Dietsch; Cindy Wolmutt; William Sperfslage

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-3125
___________________________
Louis Jonathan Cutwright
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Sean Crawford; Sheryl Dahm; Tracy Dietsch; Cindy Wolmutt; William Sperfslage
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
____________
Submitted: March 16, 2015
Filed: March 17, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BYE, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Louis Cutwright appeals after the district court dismissed his pro se 42 U.S.C.1
§ 1983 complaint preservice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and denied his post-judgment
The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for1
the Southern District of Iowa.

-- 1 of 2 --

motion for reconsideration. Upon careful review, we find no basis for reversal. See
Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (de novo review
of § 1915A dismissal); see also Ackerland v. United States, 633 F.3d 698, 701 (8th
Cir. 2011) (appellate court typically construes self-styled motion for reconsideration
as Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment, or as Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)
motion for relief from judgment); Miller v. Baker Implement Co., 439 F.3d 407, 414
(8th Cir. 2006) (appellate court reviews denial of motions under Rule 59(e) or 60(b)
for abuse of discretion).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --