Detrick Lockridge v. Per Mar Security & Research Corp.

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-3396
___________________________
Detrick Lockridge
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Per Mar Security & Research Corp.
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: May 6, 2015
Filed: May 13, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, BYE and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Detrick Lockridge appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary1
judgment in his action against his former employer, in which he asserted claims of
The Honorable Michael J. Davis, Chief Judge, United States District Court for1
the District of Minnesota.

-- 1 of 2 --

unlawful discrimination and retaliation. Upon careful de novo review, we conclude
that the district court’s decision was correct. See Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643
F.3d 1031, 1042-43 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (standard of review); see also Moody
v. Vozel, 771 F.3d 1093, 1097 (8th Cir. 2014) (discussing standards applicable to
claim of discriminatory termination), petition for cert. filed, –– U.S.L.W. –– (U.S.
Apr. 23, 2015) (No. 14-1271); Alvarez v. Des Moines Bolt Supply, Inc., 626 F.3d
410, 416-18 (8th Cir. 2010) (discussing standards applicable to claim of unlawful
retaliation).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --