The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-3330•William Simpson Edwards v. Stephen E. Sparks
13-3330Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMay 29, 2015
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-3552
___________________________
William Simpson Edwards
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Stephen E. Sparks
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
John Boilingcamp
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant
Nancy Roth; John Hawk; Rebecca Bowker; Dave DeGrange; Harbans Deol;
Coleen Kascel; Deb Nichols; Nick Ludwick; William Sperflage; Sheryl Dahm;
John Baldwin
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
____________
Submitted: May 1, 2015
Filed: May 5, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
-- 1 of 2 --
PER CURIAM.
Inmate William Simpson Edwards appeals the district court’s adverse grant1
of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We agree with the district
court’s well-reasoned determination that the summary judgment record did not reveal
any genuine issues of material fact. See Allard v. Baldwin, 779 F.3d 768, 771 (8th
Cir. 2015) (de novo review). Because we find no basis for reversal, and Edwards
offers none, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable Helen C. Adams, United States Magistrate Judge for the1
Southern District of Iowa, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.