The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-3579•United States of America v. James Lee Flowers, III
13-3579Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJun 30, 2015
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-3492
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
James Lee Flowers, III
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
____________
Submitted: June 5, 2015
Filed: June 22, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
James Flowers appeals from the judgment of the District Court denying his 281
U.S.C. § 2255 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The District Court granted
The Honorable James M. Moody, Jr., United States District Judge for the1
Eastern District of Arkansas.
-- 1 of 2 --
Flowers a certificate of appealability on his claim that his counsel was ineffective for
failing to file a direct appeal as requested. After de novo review of Flowers’s
ineffective-assistance claim, according deference to the District Court’s credibility
findings, we conclude that the court did not clearly err in finding that Flowers did not
ask his attorney to file an appeal. See Walking Eagle v. United States, 742 F.3d 1079,
1082 (8th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, we affirm.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.