The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-3025•United States of America v. William Soward, Jr.
14-3025Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOct 30, 2015
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-2222
___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
William Soward, Jr.,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
____________
Submitted: September 17, 2015
Filed: October 2, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
William Soward directly appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised
release for the second time, and sentenced him within his Chapter 7 advisory range
1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the
Southern District of Iowa.
-- 1 of 2 --
to 18 months in prison followed by 9 years of supervised release. For reversal, he
argues that the revocation sentence is substantively unreasonable.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose an
unreasonable revocation sentence. See United States v. Growden, 663 F.3d 982, 984
(8th Cir. 2011) (per curiam); United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir.
2009). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We also grant
counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.