The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-3434•United States of America v. Ronald Mazza
14-3434Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 31, 2016
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-2452
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Ronald Mazza
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield
____________
Submitted: March 4, 2016
Filed: March 10, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Ronald Mazza directly appeals the below-Guidelines-range sentence the district
court imposed after he pled guilty to sex offenses. His counsel has moved to1
The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the1
Western District of Missouri.
-- 1 of 2 --
withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
arguing that the sentence is procedurally and substantively unsound. Mazza has
moved for appointment of new counsel on appeal.
We have carefully reviewed the district court’s sentencing decision and find
no abuse of discretion. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir.
2009) (en banc). Moreover, we have independently reviewed the record pursuant to
Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and conclude there are no nonfrivolous issues.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, the motion for new counsel is denied, and
the judgment is affirmed.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.