United States of America v. Joshua Thomas

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-3500
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Joshua Thomas
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
____________
Submitted: March 23, 2016
Filed: March 28, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Joshua Thomas directly appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1
after he pleaded guilty to one count of possessing child pornography. His counsel has
The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the1
Western District of Arkansas.

-- 1 of 2 --

moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), arguing that the sentence was unreasonable. We conclude that the below-
Guidelines sentence was not substantively unreasonable. See United States v.
Salazar-Aleman, 741 F.3d 878, 881 (8th Cir. 2013) (under substantive review, district
court abuses its discretion if it fails to consider relevant factor, gives significant
weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of judgment in
weighing factors); United States v. Lazarski, 560 F.3d 731, 733 (8th Cir. 2009) (when
downward variance is granted, it is “nearly inconceivable” that court abuses
discretion in not varying downward further). We have reviewed the record
independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and we find no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to
withdraw.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --