The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1472•Amie Reeves v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
15-1472Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMay 31, 2016
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-3289
___________________________
Amie Reeves
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: May 24, 2016
Filed: May 27, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Amie Reeves appeals the district court’s order affirming the denial of1
supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. Upon de novo
The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the1
Western District of Missouri.
-- 1 of 2 --
review, see Lott v. Colvin, 772 F.3d 546, 548-49 (8th Cir. 2014), we conclude that
the two narrow issues Ms. Reeves identifies do not provide a basis for reversing the
administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) determination that she is not disabled. To warrant
remand, a claimant must show prejudice from an error during administrative
proceedings, see Samons v. Astrue, 497 F.3d 813, 821 (8th Cir. 2007); and an ALJ’s
failure to cite certain evidence does not indicate that the evidence was not considered,
see Craig v. Apfel, 212 F.3d 433, 436 (8th Cir. 2000). The judgment of the district
court is affirmed.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.