The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1734•Doug Weischman v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
15-1734Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitAug 31, 2016
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-1551
___________________________
Doug Weischman
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
____________
Submitted: August 12, 2016
Filed: August 17, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
-- 1 of 2 --
Douglas Weischman appeals the district court’s order affirming the denial of1
supplemental security income. Upon de novo review, we find that substantial
evidence on the record as a whole supports the administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s)
decision that Mr. Weischman was not disabled. See Andrews v. Colvin, 791 F.3d
923, 928 (8th Cir. 2015). Specifically, we defer to the ALJ’s credibility findings, see
McDade v. Astrue, 720 F.3d 994, 998 (8th Cir. 2013) (credibility findings are entitled
to deference if supported by good reasons and substantial evidence); and we find that
the ALJ’s determination of Mr. Weischman’s residual functional capacity (RFC),
which was more limited than the determinations of the reviewing and consulting
physicians, is consistent with the medical evidence and, for the most part, with Mr.
Weischman’s own description of his ability to sit, stand, walk and carry, see Myers
v. Colvin, 721 F.3d 521, 527 (8th Cir. 2013) (RFC must be determined based on all
relevant evidence, including medical records, observations of treating physicians and
others, and claimant’s own description of his limitations; RFC must be supported by
some medical evidence). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
______________________________
The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern1
District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable J.
Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.