The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-1682•Dr. Girish Sahu, MD v. Minneapolis Community
15-1682Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitFeb 28, 2017
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-1741
___________________________
Dr. Girish Sahu, MD
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Minneapolis Community and Technical College; Dr. Hafed Bouassida, PhD; Dr.
Jess Lee Niebuhr, PhD; Dianna Cusick
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: February 2, 2017
Filed: February 7, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
-- 1 of 2 --
Dr. Girish Sahu appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims under1
42 U.S.C. § 1981, Title VI, and state law. He also has moved for sanctions in this
court. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
A de novo review of the record reveals dismissal was proper. See Adams v.
American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 813 F.3d 1151, 1154 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review
of grant of motion to dismiss). As to Sahu’s motion for sanctions, there is no
indication that defendants acted in bad faith.
The judgment is affirmed and Sahu’s motion is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District1
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin
L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.