The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1027•Gary Black v. Moneygram Payment Systems, Inc.; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
16-1027Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 31, 2017
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-3265
___________________________
Gary Black
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Moneygram Payment Systems, Inc.; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: March 2, 2017
Filed: March 13, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Gary Black appeals following the district court’s adverse grant of summary1
judgment in his diversity action. After careful review of the record below, the parties’
The Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig, United States District Court Judge for the1
Eastern District of Missouri.
-- 1 of 2 --
submissions on appeal, and the issues properly before us, see Beaulieu v. Ludeman,
690 F.3d 1017, 1024 (8th Cir. 2012) (standard of review in reviewing grant of
summary judgment), we conclude that the district court properly granted summary
judgment on the record before it, and that Black’s arguments for reversal lack merit.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.