The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-3680•United States of America v. Dewuan C. Williams
15-3680Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJun 30, 2017
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-3921
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Dewuan C. Williams
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: June 12, 2017
Filed: June 15, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Dewuan C. Williams directly appeals the sentence he received after pleading
guilty to a felon-in-possession offense. His counsel has filed a brief under Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which she argues that Williams’s sentence is
unreasonable and requests leave to withdraw.
-- 1 of 2 --
Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court 1 did not impose an
unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir.
2009) (en banc) (explaining that sentences are reviewed under deferential abuse-of-
discretion standard and discussing substantive reasonableness). In addition, having
independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988),
we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to
withdraw, and we affirm Williams’s sentence.
______________________________
1 The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.