The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-2849•Donnie Ray Dumas v. Matthew A. Falkner; Gary L. Broyles
16-2849Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitDec 28, 2017
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-1942
___________________________
Donnie Ray Dumas
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Matthew A. Falkner; Gary L. Broyles
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: December 7, 2017
Filed: December 12, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Donnie Ray Dumas appeals after the District Court granted summary judgment1
to defendants in his action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of
The Honorable Stephen R. Bough, United States District Judge for the1
Western District of Missouri.
-- 1 of 2 --
Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Viewing the summary judgment
record in the light most favorable to Dumas and drawing all reasonable inferences in
his favor, we agree with the District Court that summary judgment was warranted.
See Clay v. Credit Bureau Enters., Inc., 754 F.3d 535, 539 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard
of review). We further conclude that the court did not err in denying Dumas’s motion
to add a habeas claim against the United States Parole Commission. See Kozlov v.
Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc., 818 F.3d 380, 394–95 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard
of review). We affirm the judgment.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.