The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-4098•Dorothy E. Petris v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Commissioner of Social Security
16-4098Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJan 29, 2018
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-1163
___________________________
Dorothy E. Petris
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Nancy A. Berryhill, Commissioner of Social Security
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: December 27, 2017
Filed: January 2, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Dorothy E. Petris appeals the order of the district court affirming the1
Commissioner’s denial of supplemental security income. For reversal, Petris
The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western1
District of Missouri.
-- 1 of 2 --
challenges the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ’s) physical and mental residual
function capacity findings. Having reviewed the parties’ submissions and the record
before us, we conclude that the ALJ’s determinations are supported by substantial
competent evidence on the record as a whole and that Petris’s arguments do not
support reversal. See Wildman v. Astrue, 596 F.3d 959, 969 (8th Cir. 2010). The
judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.