The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-3057•Shannon Robinett v. United States
16-3057Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 30, 2018
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-1665
___________________________
Manuel Ordaz-Flores
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Attorney General of the United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: February 20, 2018
Filed: March 5, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Manuel Ordaz-Flores, a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s (IJ’s) decision
to deny his application for cancellation of removal on discretionary hardship grounds
under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). After careful review, we conclude that the IJ used the
proper standard in denying relief, and thus that Ordaz-Flores has not raised a
-- 1 of 2 --
cognizable challenge to the decision below. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to
review the denial, see Gomez-Perez v. Holder, 569 F.3d 370, 372-73 (8th Cir. 2009),
and we dismiss the petition.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.