The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-3899•United States of America v. Alvaro Rodrigo Cuellar Aguilar
16-3899Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2018
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-2220
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Alvaro Rodrigo Cuellar Aguilar
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul
____________
Submitted: February 13, 2018
Filed: April 3, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Alvaro Aguilar directly appeals the within-Guidelines-range sentence the
district court 1 imposed after he pled guilty to a drug offense, pursuant to a written plea
1The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
-- 1 of 2 --
agreement containing an appeal waiver. His counsel has filed a brief under Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the appeal waiver is unenforceable,
but conceding that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Counsel has also
moved for leave to withdraw.
Upon careful review, we decline to enforce the appeal waiver. See United
States v. Boneshirt, 662 F.3d 509, 515-16 (8th Cir. 2011). Having independently
reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no non-
frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we
affirm.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.