The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1174•United States of America v. Bradley Charles Widener
17-1174Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJun 29, 2018
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-1259
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Bradley Charles Widener
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa - Dubuque
____________
Submitted: May 29, 2018
Filed: June 1, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Bradley Charles Widener appeals the sentence the district court imposed after1
revoking his supervised release. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this
court affirms.
The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern1
District of Iowa.
-- 1 of 2 --
Counsel has filed a brief arguing that the revocation sentence is substantively
unreasonable, and has moved to withdraw. Widener has filed a brief challenging both
his sentence and a special condition of supervised release requiring him to
temporarily reside at a residential reentry center (RRC) upon his release.
This court concludes that the revocation sentence is not substantively
unreasonable, see United States v. Merrival, 521 F.3d 889, 890 (8th Cir. 2008)
(abuse-of-discretion review); see also United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824
(8th Cir. 2009) (applying presumption of substantive reasonableness to revocation
sentence within Guidelines range), and that Widener’s challenge to the RRC
condition is without merit, see United States v. Melton, 666 F.3d 513, 517-18 (8th
Cir. 2012) (requiring defendant to temporarily reside at RRC as condition of
supervised release has been regularly upheld as reasonable condition).
The judgment is affirmed. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.