The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1432•Sharon L. Meeks v. Department of Human Services
17-1432Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJul 31, 2018
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-2931
___________________________
Sharon L. Meeks
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Department of Human Services
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
____________
Submitted: July 19, 2018
Filed: July 24, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Sharon Meeks appeals from the order of the District Court granting summary1
judgment to her former employer the Arkansas Department of Human Services in her
The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern1
District of Arkansas.
-- 1 of 2 --
Title VII retaliation action. After de novo review, we conclude that the District Court
did not err. See Hutton v. Maynard, 812 F.3d 679, 683–84 (8th Cir. 2016) (setting
forth the evidence necessary to survive a motion for summary judgment on a Title VII
retaliation claim); see also Conolly v. Clark, 457 F.3d 872, 876 (8th Cir. 2006) (“[A]
properly supported motion for summary judgment is not defeated by self-serving
affidavits.”).
We affirm the judgment of the District Court.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.