The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1432•United States of America v. Abiodun Oluwaseye Oladele
17-1432Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJul 31, 2018
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-2961
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Abiodun Oluwaseye Oladele
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: June 11, 2018
Filed: July 9, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, KELLY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Abiodun Oluwaseye Oladele pleaded guilty to one count of bank fraud and
received a sentence of 50 months in prison. Oladele challenges his sentence, arguing
-- 1 of 2 --
that the district court committed procedural error and that his sentence is1
substantively unreasonable. After a careful review of the record, we reject both
arguments, particularly given that the court imposed a below-Guidelines-range
sentence. See United States v. Chavarria-Ortiz, 828 F.3d 668, 671–72 (8th Cir. 2016)
(approving of a similar explanation for a within-Guidelines-range sentence); United
States v. Lazarski, 560 F.3d 731, 733 (8th Cir. 2009) (“[I]t is nearly inconceivable
that the court abused its discretion in [sentencing below the Guidelines and] not
varying downward still further.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of1
Minnesota.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.