The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1432•LaRonda Phox v. Virtuoso Sourcing Group, LLC
17-1432Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJul 31, 2018
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-3254
___________________________
LaRonda Phox
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Virtuoso Sourcing Group, LLC
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: June 25, 2018
Filed: July 2, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
-- 1 of 2 --
LaRonda Phox appeals after the district court entered an order imposing1
restrictions on future filings, and entered an order dismissing her complaint without
prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).
We conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing Phox’s complaint.
See Plymouth Cty. v. Merscorp, Inc., 774 F.3d 1155, 1158 (8th Cir. 2014) (reviewing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal de novo); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662,
678 (2009) (requiring plaintiff’s complaint to contain sufficient factual matter to state
a claim to relief that is plausible on its face); Dunham v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs.,
LLC, 663 F.3d 997, 1001 (8th Cir. 2011) (discussing Fair Debt Collection Practices
Act); Poehl v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 528 F.3d 1093, 1096 (8th Cir. 2008)
(discussing Fair Credit Reporting Act).
Given Phox’s history of filing frivolous lawsuits, we also find no abuse of
discretion in the district court’s imposition of the filing restrictions. See In re Tyler,
839 F.2d 1290, 1290-95 (8th Cir. 1988) (per curiam) (noting that courts have
discretion to place reasonable restrictions on litigant who abuses judicial process); see
also Peck v. Hoff, 660 F.2d 371, 374 (8th Cir. 1981) (per curiam) (reviewing filing
restriction for abuse of discretion).
Accordingly, we affirm the order dismissing Phox’s complaint, and we affirm
the order imposing filing restrictions.
______________________________
The Honorable Greg Kays, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the1
Western District of Missouri.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.