The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1432•United States of America v. Gaspar Jose Francisco
17-1432Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJul 31, 2018
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-3703
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Gaspar Jose Francisco
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
____________
Submitted: July 18, 2018
Filed: July 30, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In this direct criminal appeal, Gaspar Francisco challenges the sentence the
district court imposed after he pleaded guilty to enticing a minor to engage in sexual1
The Honorable Rebecca Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern1
District of Iowa.
-- 1 of 2 --
activity. His counsel has moved to withdraw and submitted a brief under Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence was unreasonable.
After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose an
unreasonable sentence, as there was no indication that it overlooked a relevant 18
U.S.C. § 3553 factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant
factors, see United States v. David, 682 F.3d 1074, 1077 (8th Cir. 2012) (standard of
review); United States v. Wohlman, 651 F.3d 878, 887 (8th Cir. 2011); and the
sentence was within the Guidelines range, see United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d
754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014). Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to
Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.