The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1191•James Jackson v. Lt. Amie Santini, Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Sandstone, Sandstone, MN, in her…
17-1191Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitAug 31, 2018
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-2154
___________________________
James Jackson
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Lt. Amie Santini, Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Sandstone, Sandstone, MN, in
her individual capacity; Lt. Daniel Gravdahl, S.I.S., Federal Bureau of Prisons,
FCI Sandstone, Sandstone, MN, in his individual capacity; Jake Bush, Paralegal,
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Sandstone, Sandstone, MN, in his individual
capacity; Denese Wilson, Warden, Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Sandstone,
Sandstone, MN, in her individual capacity
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: July 27, 2018
Filed: August 14, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
-- 1 of 2 --
Federal inmate James Jackson appeals after the district court’s dismissal1
without prejudice of his action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), for failure to exhaust his
administrative remedies. He also moves for leave to supplement his brief with an
added citation.
We conclude that the requested brief supplement is permissible. We further
conclude, upon careful de novo review, that the dismissal was proper. See 42 U.S.C.
§ 1997e(a) (exhaustion requirement); King v. Iowa Dep’t of Corr., 598 F.3d 1051,
1052-53 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review; exhaustion is precondition to inmate
bringing suit in federal court); Johnson v. Jones, 340 F.3d 624, 627 (8th Cir. 2003)
(under plain language of § 1997e(a), inmate must exhaust administrative remedies
before filing suit in federal court, and if he has not done so, dismissal is mandatory).
Accordingly, we grant the pending motion, and we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District1
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Tony N.
Leung, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.