The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1191•Donald R. Frazier, also known as Donald Muhammad v. City of Pine Bluff, Arkansas, A public body corporate
17-1191Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitAug 31, 2018
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-2832
___________________________
Donald R. Frazier, also known as Donald Muhammad
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
City of Pine Bluff, Arkansas, A public body corporate; Mike Sweeney; Matthew
Henry; Jeff Hubanks, Chief Individually and His Official Capacity
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff
____________
Submitted: August 2, 2018
Filed: August 13, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
-- 1 of 2 --
Donald Frazier appeals after the district court adversely granted summary1
judgment in his civil rights action.
Upon careful de novo review, we conclude that, as to the issues raised on
appeal, summary judgment was properly granted for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Odom v. Kaizer, 864 F.3d 920, 921 (8th Cir. 2017) (reviewing grant of
summary judgment de novo); see also Ahlberg v. Chrysler Corp., 481 F.3d 630, 638
(8th Cir. 2007) (stating that points not meaningfully argued on appeal were waived).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The Honorable Brian S. Miller, Chief Judge, United States District Court for1
the Eastern District of Arkansas.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.