The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-2428•Patrick Joseph Kiley v. United States
17-2428Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJan 31, 2019
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-1733
___________________________
Inmer Alexander Alvarado-Hernandez
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting Attorney General of the United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: January 17, 2019
Filed: January 23, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Guatemalan citizen Inmer Alexander Alvarado-Hernandez petitions for review
of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the
-- 1 of 2 --
decision of an immigration judge (IJ) denying his request for asylum and withholding
of removal. Having jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, this court denies the petition.1
After careful review, this court concludes that substantial evidence supports the
determination that Alvarado-Hernandez failed to show past persecution in Guatemala,
or a well-founded fear of future persecution there, due to any protected ground. See
8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1) (asylum requirements); Garcia-Milian v. Lynch, 825 F.3d 943,
945 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard of review); Constanza v. Holder, 647 F.3d 749, 753
(8th Cir. 2011) (particular social group). Having failed to satisfy his burden of proof
for his asylum claim, Alvarado-Hernandez has necessarily failed to satisfy the more
rigorous standard for withholding of removal. See Matul-Hernandez v. Holder, 685
F.3d 707, 713 (8th Cir. 2012).
The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
The IJ’s denial of relief under the Convention Against Torture is not before1
this panel. See Chay-Velasquez v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 751, 756 (8th Cir. 2004) (claim
not raised in opening brief is waived).
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.