The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-2428•Danny R. Moore v. Gene Beasley, Warden, Forrest City
17-2428Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJan 31, 2019
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-1985
___________________________
Danny R. Moore
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Gene Beasley, Warden, Forrest City
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena
____________
Submitted: January 15, 2019
Filed: January 29, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Danny Moore appeals after the district court dismissed his 28 U.S.C. § 22411
petition, in which he asserted his prior burglary convictions no longer qualified as
The Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern1
District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent
of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
career-offender predicates after Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243, 2257
(2016). Upon careful de novo review, see Abdullah v. Hedrick, 392 F.3d 957, 959
(8th Cir. 2004), we conclude that Moore’s claim does not entitle him to relief. See,
e.g., Martin v. United States, 904 F.3d 594, 597 (8th Cir. 2018). Accordingly, the
judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.