The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1761•Kimberly Mensie v. City of Little Rock
17-1761Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitFeb 28, 2019
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-1346
___________________________
Scott Kimrey Goldsmith
lllllllllllllllllllllAppellant
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
lllllllllllllllllllllAppellee
____________
Appeal from The United States Tax Court
____________
Submitted: February 15, 2019
Filed: February 25, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Scott Goldsmith appeals from a tax court decision, which granted summary1
judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and sustained a notice
of federal tax lien, in proceedings Goldsmith initiated under 26 U.S.C. §§ 6320 and
The Honorable Mark V. Holmes, United States Tax Court Judge.1
-- 1 of 2 --
6330. Following a careful de novo review, see Nestle Purina Petcare Co. v. Comm’r,
594 F.3d 968, 970 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing the tax court’s grant of summary
judgment de novo), we conclude that the Commissioner’s determination was correct,
for the reasons explained by the tax court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.
47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.