The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-3097•United States of America v. Maria Antonia Preciado, also known as Maria Antonia Preciado-Hernandez
17-3097Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJun 28, 2019
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-3274
___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Maria Antonia Preciado, also known as Maria Antonia Preciado-Hernandez,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: June 20, 2019
Filed: June 26, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Maria Preciado pleaded guilty to a drug offense under a plea agreement
containing an appeal waiver. The district court sentenced her to a term of1
The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the1
District of Minnesota.
-- 1 of 2 --
imprisonment below the advisory guidelines range. Preciado appeals; her counsel has
moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence.
We will enforce the appeal waiver in this case because Preciado entered into
the plea agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily, her challenge
to the sentence falls within the scope of the appeal waiver, and no miscarriage of
justice would result from enforcing the waiver. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d
702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003)
(en banc). Further, we have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the
scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal based on the appeal
waiver, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.