The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-1371•United States of America v. Maria Esther Carrillo-Varelas
18-1371Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJul 31, 2019
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-3209
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Maria Esther Carrillo-Varelas
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
____________
Submitted: June 27, 2019
Filed: July 1, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before KELLY, BOWMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Maria Esther Carrillo-Varelas directly appeals after she pled guilty to a drug-
trafficking offense, and the district court sentenced her to a prison term below the1
The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the1
Western District of Arkansas.
-- 1 of 2 --
calculated United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual (“Guidelines”)
range. Her counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
challenging the district court’s application of two Guidelines enhancements, one for
maintaining a premises for the purpose of distributing a controlled substance, and the
other for possessing a dangerous weapon during a drug-trafficking offense.
After careful review of the record, we conclude that the enhancements were
properly applied, as they were not based on clearly erroneous findings. See United
States v. Miller, 698 F.3d 699, 705 (8th Cir. 2012) (noting whether the defendant
maintained a premises for the purpose of distributing a controlled substance is a
factual finding reviewed for clear error); United States v. Atkins, 250 F.3d 1203, 1213
(8th Cir. 2001) (noting whether the defendant possessed a firearm during a
drug-trafficking offense is a factual finding reviewed for clear error). We have also
independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and
have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.