The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1152•Leonard Luna, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Walmart Transportation, LLC, an Arkansas Corporation
16-1152Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitAug 30, 2019
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-3698
___________________________
Leonard Luna, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Walmart Transportation, LLC, an Arkansas Corporation
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
____________
Submitted: August 9, 2019
Filed: August 14, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In this action under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Leonard Luna appeals
following the district court’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal for1
The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the1
Western District of Arkansas.
-- 1 of 2 --
failure to state a claim. We find no basis for reversal. Even considering the
allegations in a declaration Luna offered in response to the motion to dismiss, we
conclude that the complaint would fail. See Phipps v. FDIC, 417 F.3d 1006, 1010
(8th Cir. 2005) (Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal may be affirmed on any basis supported by
record); cf. Doe v. Dardenelle Sch. Dist., 928 F.3d 722, 727 (8th Cir. 2019)
(reviewing denial of leave to amend for abuse of discretion, and questions of futility
de novo). We also find that discovery was properly stayed after the court ruled from
the bench that the first amended complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim,
and advised the parties a written order would be forthcoming. See First Commercial
Trust Co., N.A. v. Colt’s Mfg. Co., 77 F.3d 1081, 1083 n.4 (8th Cir. 1996) (litigants
have no right to discovery absent plausible legal theory). The judgment is affirmed.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.