The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1238•United States v. Donald Stewart
19-1238Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitSep 27, 2019
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-3560
___________________________
Doyle Dennis Smith
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Appeal from The United States Tax Court
____________
Submitted: August 28, 2019
Filed: September 4, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Doyle Smith appeals the tax court’s dismissal of his petition after he failed to1
pay the filing fee. Following careful review, we conclude that the tax court did not
err in dismissing Smith’s petition. See Tax Ct. Rule 20(d) (fee of $60 shall be paid
The Honorable Maurice B. Foley, Chief Judge, United States Tax Court.1
-- 1 of 2 --
at time petition is filed; fee may be waived if petitioner shows inability to pay); Tax
Ct. Rule 123(b) (tax court may dismiss case for petitioner’s failure to prosecute or
failure to comply with Tax Court Rules); Long v. Comm’r, 742 F.2d 1141, 1143 (8th
Cir. 1984) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal under Rule 123(b)). Accordingly, we
affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.