The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-2904•United States of America v. Kenneth Craig James
18-2904Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOct 31, 2019
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-1718
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Kenneth Craig James
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
____________
Submitted: October 23, 2019
Filed: October 24, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Kenneth James appeals the sentence the district court imposed after he pleaded1
guilty to a drug offense. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief
The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the1
Southern District of Iowa.
-- 1 of 2 --
under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the substantive
reasonableness of the sentence.
After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a
substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455,
461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (discussing abuse-of-discretion review of sentence
for substantive reasonableness). Having independently reviewed the record under
Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion, and we affirm.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.