Spencer Pierce v. Jerry Lovejoy

18-1425Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitNov 27, 2019

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-1087
___________________________
Spencer Pierce
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Jerry Lovejoy; Mike Roth; Rex Sparks; Securus Technology; John P. Sarcone;
Matthew Towers; Trudy Simonson; Brad Youngblut; Gerald Fisher; Mark
Paulson; John Doe; Lorna Garcia; James Entrekin; Michael McTaggart; Brady Carney
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
____________
Submitted: November 6, 2019
Filed: November 13, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

Spencer Pierce appeals three district court1 orders disposing of his pro se 42
U.S.C. § 1983 action. Following a careful review, we conclude that the district court
did not err in dismissing the case. See Plymouth Cty. v. Merscorp, Inc., 774 F.3d
1155, 1158 (8th Cir. 2014) (dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)
is reviewed de novo); Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006) (grant
of summary judgment is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Southern District of Iowa.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.