The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1377•Rohit Kumar v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of United States (Matthew G. Whittaker named on…
19-1377Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitDec 30, 2019
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-2493
___________________________
Rohit Kumar
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
William P. Barr, Attorney General of United States (Matthew G. Whittaker named
on original complaint); Joseph P. Kelly; Jessie K. Liu
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
____________
Submitted: December 17, 2019
Filed: December 20, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before STRAS, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
-- 1 of 2 --
Rohit Kumar appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se action against
several federal actors. After careful de novo review, we conclude that the district
court did not err in dismissing the case. See Kelly v. City of Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070,
1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.
47B.
______________________________
1The Honorable John M. Gerrard, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of Nebraska.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.