Full text
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-2020
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Kendrick Dotstry
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: January 30, 2020
Filed: February 6, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Kendrick Dotstry appeals the district court’s1 denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)
motion. Upon careful review of the record, including the well-reasoned opinion of the
1The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of Minnesota.
-- 1 of 2 --
district court, we conclude there was no abuse of discretion in the denial of post-
judgment relief. See Noah v. Bond Cold Storage, 408 F.3d 1043, 1045 (8th Cir. 2005)
(court reviews denial of Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion; Rule 60(b)
authorizes relief in only most exceptional cases). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th
Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
