The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-3085•United States of America v. Montez L. Clayton
18-3085Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 31, 2020
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-2833
___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Montez L. Clayton,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: March 17, 2020
Filed: March 20, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, WOLLMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In 2019, Montez Clayton pleaded guilty to four counts of Hobbs Act robbery,
in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a), and one count of using a firearm during and in
relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(ii). The
-- 1 of 2 --
district court1 sentenced him to a total of 240 months in prison and five years of
supervised release, and ordered restitution of $250. Clayton appeals, and his counsel
has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), acknowledging that
the plea agreement included an appeal waiver, but challenging the substantive
reasonableness of the sentence and the district court’s purported failure to address
adequately the factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).
Following de novo review, we conclude that this appeal falls within the scope
of the appeal waiver. We will enforce the waiver because the plea agreement and
plea colloquy demonstrate that Clayton knowingly and voluntarily entered into the
plea agreement, including its waiver provisions, and that enforcing waiver would not
result in miscarriage of justice. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th
Cir. 2003) (en banc). In addition, we have independently reviewed the record under
Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for
appeal. We therefore grant counsel leave to withdraw and dismiss this appeal.
______________________________
1The Honorable Greg Kays, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.