United States of America v. Kristian Bartholomew Price, Originally named Kristian Price

19-1553Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2020

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-2105
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Kristian Bartholomew Price, Originally named Kristian Price
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
____________
Submitted: April 2, 2020
Filed: April 13, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Kristian Price appeals after he pled guilty to a child pornography offense,
pursuant to a plea agreement containing an appeal waiver, and the district court1
1The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.

-- 1 of 2 --

sentenced him within the advisory range under the United States Sentencing
Guidelines Manual. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing the appeal waiver is
unenforceable and Price’s sentence is substantively unreasonable. This court required
supplemental briefing on these issues.
Upon careful de novo review, we conclude the appeal waiver is valid,
applicable, and enforceable. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir.
2010) (reviewing de novo validity and applicability of appeal waiver); United States
v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (enforcing appeal waiver if
appeal falls within scope of waiver, defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into
plea agreement and waiver, and enforcing waiver would not result in miscarriage of
justice). We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488
U.S. 75 (1988), and there are no non-frivolous issues for appeal falling outside the
scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and
we grant the government’s motion to dismiss this appeal.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.