Cadero King v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security Administration

19-1398Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJun 30, 2020

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-3438
___________________________
Cadero King
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
____________
Submitted: June 9, 2020
Filed: June 12, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Cadero King appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of disability
insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Upon de novo review, we find
1The Honorable John M. Gerrard, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of Nebraska.

-- 1 of 2 --

no basis, and King offers none, for reversal. See Nash v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin.,
907 F.3d 1086, 1089 (8th Cir. 2018) (de novo review of district court’s judgment;
upholding Commissioner’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence on
record as whole). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.2
______________________________
2We agree with the district court that King’s filings reflect his
misunderstanding of what is required for him to prove that he is disabled and entitled
to benefits. Thus, like the district court, we suggest that King would be well advised
to seek out an experienced representative to assist him if he intends to reapply for
benefits.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.