The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1398•United States of America v. Cortez Lamar Kellum
19-1398Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJun 30, 2020
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 20-1200
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Cortez Lamar Kellum
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
____________
Submitted: June 9, 2020
Filed: June 12, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Cortez Kellum appeals a below-Guidelines-range sentence of 6 months in
prison for violating the conditions of supervised release. He challenges the
substantive reasonableness of the sentence, and his attorney seeks permission to
withdraw.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
We conclude that Kellum’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See United
States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir. 2009) (reviewing the reasonableness of
a revocation sentence for an abuse of discretion). The record establishes that the
district court1 sufficiently considered the statutory sentencing factors, 18 U.S.C.
§§ 3553(a), 3583(e)(3), and did not rely on an improper factor or commit a clear
error of judgment. See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923–24 (8th Cir.
2006). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and grant counsel permission to
withdraw.
______________________________
1 The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern
District of Iowa.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.