United States of America v. Deangelio Noye

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 20-1300
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Deangelio Noye
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids
____________
Submitted: June 9, 2020
Filed: June 12, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRASZ, BEAM, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Deangelio Noye appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after he
pleaded guilty to a firearm offense. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed
1The Honorable C.J. Williams, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Iowa.

-- 1 of 2 --

a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the substantive
reasonableness of the sentence.
Upon careful review under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard, see Gall
v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 41 (2007), we conclude that the district court did not
impose an unreasonable sentence. The court properly considered the factors set forth
in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and there is no indication that the court overlooked a relevant
factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a
clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors. See United States v. Feemster,
572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc); see also United States v. Munz, 780
F.3d 1199, 1200-01 (8th Cir. 2015) (per curiam). Finally, we have independently
reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the
judgment.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --