The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1785•Andre Saunders v. Warden, FCI-Sandstone
20-1785Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitNov 30, 2020
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-3677
___________________________
Andre Saunders
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant
v.
Warden, FCI-Sandstone
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: November 6, 2020
Filed: November 17, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Federal prisoner Andre Saunders appeals the district court’s1 order denying his
28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition seeking restoration of 41 days of good conduct time
1The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
David T. Schultz, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-- 1 of 2 --
taken away, after a disciplinary hearing, when he was found guilty of possessing a
cell phone discovered outside his living area at the FCI Morgantown facility.
Following de novo review, we agree with the district court that “some evidence”
supports the disciplinary hearing officer’s decision. Forensic analysis showed that
the phone had been used to call Saunders’s cousin’s phone number, a number not
associated with any other of the facility’s 900 inmates. We therefore affirm the
judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.