The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1785•United States of America v. Timothy Jermaine Gunn, also known as Doh-Doh
20-1785Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitNov 30, 2020
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 20-1859
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Timothy Jermaine Gunn, also known as Doh-Doh
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern
____________
Submitted: November 3, 2020
Filed: November 6, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Timothy Gunn appeals the district court’s1 order denying his motions for relief
under the First Step Act of 2018 (FSA). See Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194.
1The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Southern District of Iowa.
-- 1 of 2 --
The district court determined Gunn was eligible for relief under the FSA, but declined
to reduce his sentence.
In exercising its discretion to deny relief, the district court considered the
factors on which it based Gunn’s original sentence and concluded they outweighed
Gunn’s arguments in favor of a sentence reduction. We find no abuse of discretion
in the district court’s denial of relief. See United States v. McDonald, 944 F.3d 769,
771 (8th Cir. 2019) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the
district court, and grant counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.