The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1340•Corey E. Fisherman v. Jared McGriff, also known as Jered McGreiff
19-1340Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitDec 31, 2020
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 20-1671
___________________________
Corey E. Fisherman
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Jared McGriff, also known as Jered McGreiff; Bradley Dupre, M.D.; Kristin
Jacobs; Vicki Dean-Gramlich; Jack Serier
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
Kristin, RN Pro M-H
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: December 21, 2020
Filed: December 28, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
-- 1 of 2 --
Corey Fisherman appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of
summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the
record, we find no basis for reversal. See Odom v. Kaizer, 864 F.3d 920, 921 (8th
Cir. 2017) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo); Carter v. Arkansas, 392
F.3d 965, 968 (8th Cir. 2004) (dismissal for failure to state a claim is reviewed de
novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota, adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Elizabeth
Cowan Wright, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.