The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-3405•Clayton Walker v. Steve Barnett, Secretary of State
19-3405Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2021
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 20-2870
___________________________
Clayton Walker
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Steve Barnett, Secretary of State, in his official capacity; Shantel Krebs, in her
individual capacity; Marty Jackley, in his individual capacity; Jason Ravnsborg, in
his official capacity; Kea Warne, in her official capacity
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of South Dakota - Southern
____________
Submitted: March 22, 2021
Filed: April 2, 2021
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SHEPHERD, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
-- 1 of 2 --
Clayton Walker appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of
summary judgment in his civil action challenging the constitutionality of certain
South Dakota election laws. Upon careful de novo review, see Odom v. Kaizer, 864
F.3d 920, 921 (8th Cir. 2017) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo);
Libertarian Party of N.D. v. Jaeger, 659 F.3d 687, 692-93 (8th Cir. 2011) (dismissal
for failure to state a claim is reviewed de novo), we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Walker’s appellate motions.
______________________________
1The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the
District of South Dakota.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.