Jose Luis Elias-Huinac v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of United States

19-3405Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2021

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 20-2904
___________________________
Jose Luis Elias-Huinac
Petitioner
v.
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of United States
Respondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: April 08, 2021
Filed: April 13, 2021
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Guatemalan citizen Jose Luis Elias-Huinac petitions for review of an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen proceedings.
Having jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, this court finds no basis for reversal.

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
This court concludes that Elias-Huinac’s due process claim is without merit.
See Alva-Arellano v. Lynch, 811 F.3d 1064, 1066 (8th Cir. 2016) (to establish due
process violation, noncitizen must demonstrate both fundamental procedural error,
and prejudice); Nunez-Portillo v. Holder, 763 F.3d 974, 977 (8th Cir. 2014) (no
constitutionally protected liberty interest in discretionary remedy of cancellation of
removal). The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Elias-Huinac’s untimely
motion to reopen. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) (motion to reopen must be filed
within 90 days of entry of final order of removal); Vargas v. Holder, 567 F.3d 387,
391 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review).
The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.