The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1050•Montez Caples v. Charles Marmor, Chaplain; Ken Pirc, Religious Activities Review Coordinator
20-1050Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJun 30, 2021
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 20-3484
___________________________
Montez Caples
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Charles Marmor, Chaplain; Ken Pirc, Religious Activities Review Coordinator
Defendants - Appellees
Patti Wachtendorf, Warden; Mike Schierbrock, Security Director; John Fedler,
Security Director; Michelle Waddle, Unit Manager
Defendants
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Central
____________
Submitted: June 4, 2021
Filed: June 15, 2021
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
-- 1 of 2 --
Montez Caples is an inmate in the custody of the Iowa Department of
Corrections (IDOC) at the Iowa State Penitentiary (ISP). In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983
action, Caples claimed IDOC and ISP officials infringed on his First Amendment
rights to freely exercise his “Hebrew Israelite” religion when they denied him
vendor-produced kosher meals for Passover and Sukkot while he was housed in an
administrative segregation unit. The district court1 determined all defendants were
entitled to qualified immunity and granted summary judgment in their favor. Caples
appeals.
After a searching and careful review of the record and arguments on appeal, we
conclude the grant of summary judgment was appropriate. See Boudoin v. Harsson,
962 F.3d 1034, 1039 (8th Cir. 2020) (standard of review); Goff v. Graves, 362 F.3d
543, 549 (8th Cir. 2004) (concluding that no constitutional violation occurred since
the prison’s ban on religious food in a segregation unit was “reasonably related to the
legitimate penological interest of preserving institutional security”). Because
defendants are entitled to qualified immunity, we affirm. See 8th Cir. 47B.
______________________________
1The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge
for the Southern District of Iowa.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.