Latreka Jones v. Capella University

20-1050Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJun 30, 2021

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 20-3670
___________________________
Latreka Jones
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Capella University; Julie Johnson; Shannon Stordahl; Joe Rennie, Sr. Learners
Affairs Associates; Dr. Jennifer Raymar, President's Designee for Academic Appeals
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: June 9, 2021
Filed: June 14, 2021
[Unpublished]
____________
Before ERICKSON, MELLOY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

Latreka Jones appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her pro se complaint
against Capella University (Capella), a Minnesota for-profit online university, and
four Capella employees, and the denial of her motion to amend her complaint.
Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find
no basis for reversal. See Montin v. Moore, 846 F.3d 289 (8th Cir. 2017) (de novo
review of Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal); Zutz v. Nelson, 601 F.3d 842, 850 (8th
Cir. 2010) (ordinarily, denial of leave to amend is reviewed for abuse of discretion,
but when district court denies leave on basis of futility, this court reviews underlying
legal conclusions de novo; amendment is futile when it could not survive a motion
to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6)). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of
Minnesota.
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.