United States of America v. Myron Jay Azure

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 20-2319
___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Myron Jay Azure
Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of North Dakota - Eastern
____________
Submitted: April 12, 2021
Filed: July 9, 2021
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, WOLLMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Myron Azure pleaded guilty to aggravated sexual abuse of a child. See 18
U.S.C. §§ 1153, 2241(c). As part of the plea agreement, he waived his “right[] to
appeal . . . [his] sentence” unless, as relevant here, his prison term exceeded “the
upper end of the applicable guidelines range.” The Sentencing Guidelines

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
recommended a sentence of life in prison, which is exactly what the district court1
gave him. Azure argues that his sentence is substantively unreasonable and that he
was ineligible for an enhancement and an upward adjustment he received. See
U.S.S.G. §§ 2A3.1(b)(3), 3D1.4.
None of these issues are properly before us because Azure waived his right to
appeal. Reviewing the validity and applicability of the appeal waiver de novo, see
United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010), we conclude that it is
unambiguous, enforceable, and applicable. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886,
889–92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (explaining that an appeal waiver will be enforced
if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the defendant knowingly and
voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver, and enforcing the waiver
would not result in a miscarriage of justice).
We accordingly grant the government’s motion to dismiss the appeal.
______________________________
1 The Honorable Peter D. Welte, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of North Dakota.

-- 2 of 2 --