The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-2001•James W. Shaughnessy v. Edward P. Southern, MD
20-2001Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitAug 31, 2021
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 21-1463
___________________________
James W. Shaughnessy
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Edward P. Southern, MD
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: August 16, 2021
Filed: August 19, 2021
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
James Shaughnessy appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his civil action for
lack of personal jurisdiction. Upon careful de novo review, we conclude that
1The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.
-- 1 of 2 --
dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Creative Calling
Sols., Inc. v. LF Beauty Ltd., 799 F.3d 975, 979 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review;
action should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction if evidence, viewed in light
most favorable to plaintiff, is sufficient to support conclusion that exercise of
personal jurisdiction over defendant is proper); Conn v. Zakharov, 667 F.3d 705,
717-20 (6th Cir. 2012) (defendant’s ownership of property in and occasional travel
to forum state did not establish prima facie case of general personal jurisdiction).
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.