The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-3426•United States of America v. Travis Lee Grote
20-3426Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitFeb 28, 2022
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 21-2436
___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Travis Lee Grote,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa - Western
____________
Submitted: January 31, 2022
Filed: February 7, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
-- 1 of 2 --
PER CURIAM.
Travis Grote appeals a sentence imposed by the district court1 after he pleaded
guilty to firearm offenses. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief
under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the reasonableness of
Grote’s sentence. We conclude that the sentence was not substantively unreasonable,
as there is no indication that the court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant
weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in
weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62
(8th Cir. 2009) (en banc).
We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488
U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we
affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________
1The Honorable Leonard T. Strand, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa.
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.