United States of America v. Anthony Birdine

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 21-1417
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Anthony Birdine
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
____________
Submitted: March 28, 2022
Filed: April 5, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before KELLY, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
Anthony Birdine seeks a sentence reduction under Amendments 706, 750, and
782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The district court1
denied one, and we affirm.
In the course of addressing Birdine’s motion, the district court explained why
it denied relief. See United States v. Burrell, 622 F.3d 961, 964 (8th Cir. 2010). And
that explanation was sufficient for us to conclude that there was no abuse of
discretion. See, e.g., United States v. Lewis, 827 F.3d 787, 790 (8th Cir. 2016).
______________________________
1 The Honorable Brian C. Buescher, United States District Judge for the
District of Nebraska.

-- 2 of 2 --